Transfer batches permit the processing of part of a job-lot on downstream machines before completion of the lot on the current machine. This paper studies the effects of transfer batches in two- and three-machine flow shops. It establishes conditions under which each unit of a job can optimally be viewed as a separate transfer batch. Issues of interrupted versus continuous production on downstream machines, and job-splitting (lot-sizing) are discussed. Examples are provided which show that even with a regular measure of performance and no setup times, job-splitting can yield a better solution than is possible without splitting jobs. A modification of Johnson's Algorithm for makespan minimization is derived under suitable conditions in two-machine flow shops and in special three-machine flow shops. An empirical study of transfer batch effects in two-machine flow shops is undertaken for both the makespan and the total flow time criteria under the assumption that jobs are not split. The no-split jobs restriction allows a meaningful comparison to be made between schedules with and without transfer batches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vickson et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: