Why the study?
Due to a low known genetic etiology of congenital heart disease cases (less than 40%), a digenic model approach was evaluated to identify contributing variants in known laterality defect genes.
Digenic epistatic interactions contribute significantly to the complex genetic etiology of congenital cardiac laterality defects.
Hypothesis-generating for digenic contributions to laterality defects; leaves open validation before clinical genetic testing.
Laterality defects are defined by perturbations in the usual left-right asymmetry of organs. Due to low known genetic etiology of congenital heart disease (CHD) cases (less than 40%), we used a digenic model approach for the identification of contributing variants in known laterality defect genes (N = 115) in the exome/genome sequencing (ES/GS) data from individuals with clinically diagnosed laterality defects. The unsolved ES/GS data were analyzed from three CHD cohorts: Baylor College of Medicine-Genomics Research to Elucidate the Genetics of Rare Diseases (BCM-GREGoR; N = 247 proband ES), Gabriella Miller Kids First Pediatric Research program (Kids First; N = 158 trio GS), and Pediatric Cardiac Genomics Consortium (PCGC; N = 163 trio ES), and trans-heterozygous digenic variants were identified in 2.8% (inherited digenic variants in 0.4%), 8.2%, and 13.5% cases respectively, which was significantly higher as compared to 602 control trios provided by the 1000 Genomes Project (p = 0.001, 1.4e-07, and 8.9e-13, respectively). Trans-heterozygous digenic variants were also identified in 0.4%, and 1.4% cases with non-laterality CHD in Kids First and PCGC datasets, respectively, which was not statistically significant as compared to control trios ( p = 1, and 0.059, respectively). Altogether, in laterality cohorts, 23% of digenic pairs were in the same structural complex of motile cilia. Out of 39 unique digenic pairs in laterality CHD, 29 are more likely to be potential digenic hits as predicted by DiGePred tool. These findings provide further evidence that digenic epistatic interaction can contribute to the complex genetics of laterality defects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rai et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: