Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dehydration of the Prussian blue analogues CsNi[Cr(CN)(6)] x 2 H(2)O (1) and Cr(3)[Cr(CN)(6)](2) x 10 H(2)O (2) affords two new microporous magnets: CsNi[Cr(CN)(6)] (1d) and Cr(3)[Cr(CN)(6)](2) x 6 H(2)O (2d). Compounds 1d and 2d maintain the Prussian blue structure, and N(2) adsorption measurements at 77 K show them to be microporous with BET surface areas of 360 and 400 m(2)/g, respectively. Both solids largely retain the magnetic properties of their parent hydrates, with 1d ordering at 75 K and 2d ordering at 219 K, by far the highest ordering temperature yet observed for a microporous magnet. The compounds further show unexpected changes in their magnetic properties upon adsorption of O(2). In 2d, adsorption of O(2) results in a reversible decrease in the magnetic moment of the system, as well as a reduction of the coercivity from 110 to 10 G and of the remnant magnetization from 1200 to 400 emu.G/mol, indicating a net antiferromagnetic interaction between O(2) and the framework. In 1d, adsorption of O(2) instead results in a reversible increase in the magnetic moment of the system, indicating a net ferromagnetic interaction between O(2) and the framework. Together, the results suggest that ferromagnetic exchange coupling between O(2) and the [Cr(CN)(6)](3-) units provides the predominate magnetic interaction of the adsorbate with the framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaye et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: