Why the study?
Patients with intermediate-risk PE often experience extended hospitalizations and varied outcomes depending on the treatment modality.
Does computer-assisted vacuum thrombectomy (CAVT) improve healthcare resource utilization and outcomes compared to anticoagulation, catheter-directed thrombolysis, or other mechanical thrombectomy in adult inpatients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism?
Does computer-assisted vacuum thrombectomy (CAVT) improve healthcare resource utilization and outcomes compared to anticoagulation, catheter-directed thrombolysis, or other mechanical thrombectomy in adult inpatients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism?
In patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism, computer-assisted vacuum thrombectomy was associated with shorter hospital stays, fewer ICU days, and lower complication rates compared to anticoagulation, catheter-directed thrombolysis, or other mechanical thrombectomy.
CAVT was associated with shorter stays in intermediate-risk PE; hypothesis-generating for resource benefits, pending randomized confirmation.
Patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) often experience extended hospitalizations and varied outcomes depending on the treatment modality. This study compares outcomes and healthcare resource utilization among patients treated with anticoagulation (AC), catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDL), other mechanical thrombectomy (MT), or computer-assisted vacuum thrombectomy (CAVT) in the U.S. Adult inpatients with intermediate-risk PE discharged between 07/01/2020 and 09/30/2023 were retrospectively identified from the Vizient Clinical Data Base. ICD-10 codes identified treatment modalities. Propensity score matching (PSM) equated groups 1:1 using demographics, payer and hospital type. Outcomes included length of stay (LOS), postprocedure LOS (PPLOS), postprocedure intensive care unit days (PPICU), in-hospital mortality, composite complications, discharge status, and readmission rates. PSM matched 515 patients across groups. Baseline data were similar. CAVT had shorter LOS (4.6 ± 3.23d) than AC (6.2 ± 3.72d, p < 0.0001), CDL (7.1 ± 4.42d, p < 0.0001), and MT (7.0 ± 4.62d, p < 0.0001). CAVT had shorter PPLOS (3.8 ± 3.16d) than CDL (6.1 ± 4.33d, p < 0.0001) and MT (6.2 ± 4.52d, p < 0.0001). CAVT had fewer and shorter PPICU stays than CDL (44.3% vs 82.7%, p < 0.0001; 0.7 ± 1.3d vs 1.6 ± 1.5d, p < 0.0001). CAVT showed lower composite complications than MT (1.2% vs 4.1%, p = 0.0034), and lower incidence of acute kidney injury development during hospitalization than MT (1.9% vs 4.9%, p = 0.0099) and CDL (1.9% vs 4.5%, p = 0.0214). In-hospital mortality, 30-day all-cause and PE-related readmissions were similar. CAVT had a higher rate of discharge to home (69%) than AC (55.5%, p < 0.0001), CDL (56.3%, p < 0.0001) and MT (52.6%, p < 0.0001). In conclusion, CAVT for intermediate-risk PE may shorten LOS, PPLOS, reduce complications, and improve discharge outcomes without increasing mortality compared to other treatment modalities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patel et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: