BACKGROUND: We engaged in a community-based participatory research (CBPR) project with the New Mexico Department of Health (DOH) and its 32 county-based health councils. OBJECTIVES: We report on the process of the collaborative development of an evaluation model that would identify and link council actions to intermediate system change. METHODS: We used multiple data sources and interactive, iterative processes to systematically examine and document the health council system including document review, a statewide partnership survey, and multiple meetings with partners. LESSONS LEARNED: We highlight lessons and challenges in our CBPR process, including the need for community partners to overcome the fear of evaluation, the use of multiple participatory mechanisms, the value of a linking agent, and understanding multiple data needs. CONCLUSION: The time and resources of this participatory evaluation process enabled successful navigation of two important issues: (1) increased attention to statewide accountability of collaborative public health initiatives, and (2) increased expectation by health councils or other community partnerships to have a recognized voice in defining measures for this accountability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sánchez et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: