Why the study?
The pathogenesis of AF remains unclear, and existing studies evaluating whether connexin 40 polymorphisms influence AF risk have yielded controversial results.
Do connexin 40 (Cx40) gene polymorphisms increase the risk of atrial fibrillation?
Do connexin 40 (Cx40) gene polymorphisms increase the risk of atrial fibrillation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This meta-analysis demonstrates a significant positive association between Cx40 gene polymorphisms (especially the -44 polymorphism) and the risk of atrial fibrillation.
INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia that is associated with heart failure and stroke, leading sometimes to death. But the pathogenesis of AF remains unclear. Numerous studies have investigated whether the connexin 40 (Cx40) polymorphisms influences the risk of AF, but the results are controversial. METHODS: We searched English and Chinese databases and calculated the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) to examine the existence of genetic associations between the Cx40 polymorphisms and the risk of AF. All relevant studies were screened and meta-analyzed using Review Manager 5.0. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies, including 10 studies for -44 polymorphism (rs35594137) and 4 studies for -26 polymorphism (rs10465885), were identified for the meta-analysis. For -44 polymorphism, the results showed a significantly increased risk of AF in the five genetic models in the overall analysis. Furthermore, in subgroup analysis, increased AF risks were also observed in Asian and non-Asian populations. For -26 polymorphism, the overall OR revealed an increased risk of AF in dominant model. In subgroup analysis, increased AF risk was only found in recessive genetic model of the Asian population. CONCLUSIONS: The Cx40 polymorphisms were positively associated with AF in both populations, especially on -44 polymorphism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: