Orientation-dependent ionization potentials (IPs) of organic thin films have been investigated with the combination of synchrotron-based high-resolution photoemission spectroscopy and near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure measurements. Organic thin films of copper(II) phthalocyanine (CuPc) and its fully fluorinated counterpart of copper hexadecafluorophthalocyanine (F 16 CuPc) with well-controlled orientation are used as model systems. Both molecules lie flat on the graphite surface and stand upright on Au(111) terminated by self-assembled monolayer of octane-1-thiol. The IP for the standing-up CuPc thin film (IP = 4.75 eV) is 0.40 eV lower than that of the lying-down film (IP = 5.15 eV). In contrast, the IP of the standing up F 16 CuPc (IP = 6.50 eV) is 0.85 eV higher than that of the lying-down film (IP = 5.65 eV). This reversed orientation dependence in IP is explained by the opposite surface dipoles in the standing-up CuPc and F 16 CuPc molecular layers originating from the different intramolecular dipolar bonds exposed at the surfaces, i.e., a net upward pointing surface dipole in the standing-up CuPc thin film that lowers the IP, and a net downward pointing surface dipole in the standing-up F 16 CuPc thin film that increases the IP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: