Various combinations of incorporation and addition of apolipoprotein A-I (apo A-I) and apolipoprotein A-II (apo A-II) individually or together to a defined lecithin-cholesterol (250/12.5 molar ratio) liposome prepared by the cholate dialysis procedure were used to study the effect of apo A-II on lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT, EC 2.3.1.43) activity of both purified enzyme preparations and plasma. When apo A-I (0.1-3.0 nmol/assay) alone was incorporated or added to the liposome, apo A-I effectively activated the enzyme. By contrast, when apo A-II (0.1-3.0 nmol/assay) alone was incorporated into or added to the liposome, apo A-II exhibited minimal activation of LCAT activity, approximately 1% of the activity obtained by an equal amount of apo A-I. Addition of apo A-II (0.1-3.0 nmol/assay) together with apo A-I (0.8 nmol/assay) to the liposome reduced the LCAT activity to approximately 30% of the level obtained with addition of apo A-I alone. On the other hand, addition of apo A-II (0.1-3.0 nmol/assay) or addition of lecithin-cholesterol liposome containing apo A-II (0.1-3.0 nmol/assay) to lecithin-cholesterol liposome containing apo A-I (0.8 nmol/assay) did not significantly alter apo A-I activation of LCAT activity. However, when the same amounts (0.1-3.0 nmol/assay) of apo A-II were incorporated together with apo A-I (0.8 nmol/assay) into the liposome, apo A-II significantly stimulated LCAT activity as compared to activity obtained with incorporation of apo A-I alone. The maximal stimulation was obtained with 0.4 nmol apo A-II/assay for both purified and plasma enzyme. At this apo A-II concentration, approximately 4-fold and 1.8-fold stimulation was observed for purified enzyme and plasma enzyme, respectively. These results indicated that apo A-II must be incorporated together with apo A-I into lecithin-cholesterol liposomes to exert its stimulatory effect on LCAT activity and that apo A-II in high-density lipoprotein may play an important role in the regulation of LCAT activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John J. Albers (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: