Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Fibrosis is an important biomarker of chronic kidney injury, and a powerful predictor of renal outcome. Currently, the only method for measuring fibrotic burden is histologic analysis, which requires a kidney biopsy in humans, or kidney removal in animal models. These requirements have not only hindered our ability to manage patients effectively, but have also prevented a full understanding of renal fibrosis pathogenesis, and slowed the translation of new antifibrotic agents. The development of noninvasive fibrosis imaging tools could thus transform both clinical care and renal fibrosis research. RECENT FINDINGS: Conventional imaging modalities have historically failed to image fibrosis successfully. However, recent exciting technological advances have greatly enhanced their capabilities. New techniques, for example, may allow imaging of the physical consequences of scarring, as surrogate measures of renal fibrosis. Similarly, other groups have developed ways to directly image extracellular matrix, either with the use of contrast-enhanced probes, or using matrix components as endogenous contrast agents. SUMMARY: New developments in imaging technology have the potential to transform our ability to visualize renal fibrosis and to monitor its progression. In doing so, these advances could have major implications for kidney disease care, the development of new antiscarring agents, and our understanding of renal fibrosis in general.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hysi et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: