Understanding the underlying mechanisms by which a normal cell avoids the oncogenic potential of MUC1 signaling requires further definition of the pathways by which the MUC1 cytoplasmic tail is processed in both normal and tumor-derived cells. In the present study we describe the processing pathway initiated by TACE/ADAM17 cleavage of MUC1. Utilizing the human uterine epithelial cell line, HES, derived from normal endometrium, we show that endogenous full length MUC1 undergoes regulated intramembranous proteolysis mediated by presenillin-dependent gamma-secretase. Cytokine-stimulated HES cells exposed to gamma-secretase inhibitors accumulated a membrane-associated 15 kDa fragment of the MUC1 C-terminal subunit (CTF15). Inhibitors of TACE/ADAM17-mediated shedding inhibited accumulation of MUC1-CTF15 and MUC1 ectodomain release to a similar extent consistent with MUC1-CTF15 being a product of TACE/ADAM17 action. Reduction of catalytically active gamma-secretase complex by nicastrin siRNA treatment also resulted in CTF15 accumulation. Furthermore, mature nicastrin, the substrate receptor for gamma-secretase, co-immunoprecipitated with CTF15 in the presence of gamma-secretase inhibitors indicating the formation of CTF15: nicastrin complexes. MUC1-CTF15 accumulation in response to gamma-secretase inhibition was demonstrated in both normal and tumor-derived cells from humans and mice indicating that this processing pathway exists in many cell contexts. We did not detect products of MUC1 cleavage by gamma-secretase in the presence of various proteasomal inhibitors indicating that subsequent degradation is either non-proteasomal or extremely efficient. We suggest that this efficient pathway attenuates potential signaling mediated by cytoplasmic tail fragments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Julian et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: