OBJECTIVE: To assess patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis receiving continuous or paused etanercept treatment. METHODS: In a multicentre European open-label study, one group (n = 352) received continuous therapy: 25 mg subcutaneously (SC) twice weekly (BIW) throughout 54-weeks. The other group (n = 359) received paused therapy: 50 mg SC BIW (<or= 12 weeks) until response was adequate by Physician Global Assessment; after psoriasis returned, retreatment (25 mg BIW) was begun. PRO included the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the SF-36 Vitality subscale. RESULTS: At baseline, mean DLQI for patients in the continuous (12.8) and paused group (13.8), indicated significant quality-of-life impairment; mean EQ-5D utility scores were 0.65 and 0.66 for continuous and paused patients, respectively; 30.0% of continuous and 37.0% of paused patients had at least mild symptoms of depression; 40.2% and 48.6%, respectively, had at least mild symptoms of anxiety. At week 54, both groups showed statistically significant (P < 0.05) and meaningful improvement in DLQI and EQ-5D scores; improvements in HADS-D, HADS-A, and SF-36 vitality were also significant. Improvements in DLQI and EQ-5D were significantly greater in the continuous arm than the paused arm, but the differences were not meaningful. Differences between arms in HADS and SF-36 Vitality at week 54 were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: At baseline, patients exhibited significant quality-of-life impairment. Both continuous and paused etanercept treatment provided improvements in PRO measures. Either regimen could be considered and care should be individualized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daudén et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: