Key result
MI-contingent BCI training improves wrist extensor strength over MI-independent feedback by ~0.5 MRC points.
Why the study?
Does BCI training with MI-contingent feedback improve upper limb function and neuroplasticity in persons with chronic stroke?
RCT
Double-blind
parallel-group
Does BCI training with MI-contingent feedback improve upper limb function and neuroplasticity in persons with chronic stroke?
BCI training with MI-contingent feedback significantly improves wrist extensor strength and range of motion compared to MI-independent feedback in chronic stroke patients.
BACKGROUND: Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology can enhance neural plasticity and motor recovery in persons with stroke. However, the effects of BCI training with motor imagery (MI)-contingent feedback versus MI-independent feedback remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether the contingent connection between MI-induced brain activity and feedback influences functional and neural plasticity outcomes. We hypothesized that BCI training, with MI-contingent feedback, would result in greater improvements in upper limb function and neural plasticity compared to BCI training, with MI-independent feedback. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial included persons with chronic stroke who underwent BCI training involving functional electrical stimulation feedback on the affected wrist extensor. Primary outcomes included the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale score for muscle strength in the wrist extensor (MRC-WE) and active range of motion in wrist extension (AROM-WE). Resting-state electroencephalogram recordings were used to assess neural plasticity. RESULTS: Compared to the MI-independent feedback BCI group, the MI-contingent feedback BCI group showed significantly greater improvements in MRC-WE scores (mean difference = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.03-1.00, p = 0.036) and demonstrated increased AROM-WE at 4 weeks post-intervention (p = 0.019). Enhanced functional connectivity in the affected hemisphere was observed in the MI-contingent feedback BCI group, correlating with MRC-WE and Fugl-Meyer assessment-distal scores. Improvements were also observed in the unaffected hemisphere's functional connectivity. CONCLUSIONS: BCI training with MI-contingent feedback is more effective than MI-independent feedback in improving AROM-WE, MRC, and neural plasticity in individuals with chronic stroke. BCI technology could be a valuable addition to conventional rehabilitation for stroke survivors, enhancing recovery outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRIS (KCT0009013).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in chronic stroke. BCI training with motor imagery (MI)-contingent feedback vs. BCI training with MI-independent feedback was evaluated on Medical Research Council (MRC) scale score for muscle strength in the wrist extensor (MRC-WE) (MD 0.52, 95% CI 0.03-1.00, p=0.036). BCI training with MI-contingent feedback significantly improved wrist extensor muscle strength compared to MI-independent feedback (MD 0.52; 95% CI 0.03-1.00; p=0.036).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: