Why the study?
Does sacubitril/valsartan initiation pre-discharge improve the proportion of patients achieving target dose at 10 weeks compared to post-discharge initiation in hospitalized HFrEF patients?
Does sacubitril/valsartan initiation pre-discharge improve the proportion of patients achieving target dose at 10 weeks compared to post-discharge initiation in hospitalized HFrEF patients?
The TRANSITION study evaluates the feasibility and tolerability of initiating sacubitril/valsartan pre-discharge versus post-discharge in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated HFrEF.
Pre-discharge sacubitril/valsartan initiation is feasible and tolerable in stabilized HFrEF; extends randomized evidence for early ARNI use.
Background: Sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) is indicated for the treatment of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Evidence of safety and tolerability of S/V initiated early after decompensation requiring hospitalisation in HFrEF patients is lacking. Methods: TRANSITION (NCT02661217) is a randomised, open-label study comparing S/V initiation pre- vs. during days 1–14 post-discharge in HFrEF patients, admitted for acute decompensated HF after hemodynamic stabilization, including patients with newly diagnosed HF. All patients were stratified by pre-admission treatment status: on an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), on an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), or ACEI/ARB-naive. Patients were randomised 1:1 within each stratum for initiation of S/V treatment either pre-discharge or post-discharge. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving 200 mg S/V twice daily at 10 weeks post-randomisation. Secondary objectives assess the proportion of patients who achieve and maintain (i) a S/V dose of 100 and/or 200 mg twice daily or (ii) any dose of S/V for at least 2 weeks up to Week 10, and also (iii) the proportion of patients who permanently discontinue S/V owing to adverse events during the 10 week treatment period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wachter et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: