Intrinsic viscosity, [η], weight‐average molecular weight, M w , relationships are reported for narrow molecular weight distribution linear polyisoprene and polystyrene samples in CCl 4 at 25°C. Molecular weight values cover a range nearly two orders in magnitude, extending as low as 3 × 10 3 . In the case of polystyrene there exists a molecular weight range (around M w = 16,700) corresponding to a change in the Mark‐Houwink‐Sakurada (MHS) exponent from α = 0.71 to α = 0.54. Comparisons between the viscometric and hydrodynamic radii, from literature data, are made. For polyisoprene the MHS relationship is reported in CCl 4 , for the first time. For this case α = 0.713 for the whole range of molecular weights studied. Values for the second virial coefficient from low‐angle light‐scattering measurements support the conclusions drawn from viscometry that CCl 4 is a good solvent for both polymers studied. The different behavior of the MHS exponent may be attributed to the difference in chain flexibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Allorio et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: