Working with insect counts, Anscombe (1949 Anscombe , F. J. ( 1949 ). The Statistical Analysis of Insect Counts Based on the Negative Binomial Distribution , Biometrics 5 : 165 – 173 .[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) emphasized negative binomial modeling by introducing a parameterization involving μ(>0) and κ(>0). The parameters μ, κ stood for average “infestation” and “clumping, ” respectively. Assuming that κ was known, Willson and Folks (1983 Willson , L. J. , and Folks , J. L. ( 1983 ). Sequential Estimation of the Mean of the Negative Binomial Distribution , Sequential Analysis 2 : 55 – 70 .[Taylor & Francis Online] , [Google Scholar]) adopted purely sequential sampling to estimate μ, whereas Mukhopadhyay and Diaz (1985 Mukhopadhyay , N. , and Diaz , J. (1985). Two-Stage Sampling for Estimating the Mean of a Negative Binomial Distribution, Sequential Analysis 4:1–18.[Taylor & Francis Online] , [Google Scholar]) developed a two-stage methodology because of its operational convenience. We first prove a new striking result (Theorem 2.1) that claims the asymptotic second-order efficiency property of the two-stage procedure. In order to handle the case when κ is unknown, we develop a new approach (section 3) for evaluating estimators of μ. We control a new criterion, namely the integrated coefficient of variation (ICV), by averaging the CV with respect to a weight function for κ. A two-stage methodology is proposed, and both first- and second-order properties are highlighted (Theorems 3.1–3.3). We summarize findings from extensive sets of simulations of the two-stage methodologies both when κ is known or unknown. When κ is unknown, the robustness of the proposed methodology with respect to choices of a weight function is critically examined. In the end, both methodologies are applied to four sets of Mexican bean beetle data with encouraging findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mukhopadhyay et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: