The Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT; Kaufman & Kaufman, 1990) provides a relatively quick assessment of intelligence. In this study we assessed the validity and reliability of the K-BIT with an Australian sample of adolescents with an intellectual disability (N = 107). To examine criterion validity, K-BIT scores were correlated with scores on the Coloured Progressive Matrices (CPM; Raven, 1956; r = .52), and the Wechsler Intelligence Test for Children - Revised (WISC-R; Wechsler, 1974; r =.73-75). Test-retest and split-half reliability of the K-BIT were also examined (r = .93 and .88 respectively). Finally, item analyses examined the difficulty and discriminability of individual items. The results revealed that the K-BIT composite score in general provides a valid and reliable estimate of intelligence for Australian adolescents with an intellectual disability, but that a higher standard error estimate should be used in interpreting scores of the overall composite and Matrices scores of the K-BIT for students with an intellectual disability within the age range of 13 to 17 years.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Webber et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: