This paper examines Thailand's establishment of Special Economic Zones (SEZs) on the local economy.The analysis is based on a panel data set covering 77 provinces over the period 2012-2020.Comparing the changes between the provinces that created a SEZ and those outside the zones, it was found that the SEZ program has not attracted significant levels of foreign investment into the zones.Difference-in-difference estimation is used to assess the difference in real gross provincial product per capita and poverty rate between SEZs and non-SEZs.The main results show that after implementing the SEZ policy in 2015, the provinces that established a SEZ do not achieve a significantly higher rate of economic growth compared to those outside the SEZs.In addition, progress in poverty reduction in SEZs is not better than that in non-SEZs.The results are consistent when estimating the model using a system GMM estimator to address endogeneity issue.These results point towards a lack of a favorable investment environment in the zones and fiscal incentives offered by the SEZ program as a driving factor behind the null effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2023 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: