Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: Escherichia coli ( E. coli ) ST131 is a high-risk clone linked to CTX-M betalactamase production and fluoroquinolone resistance. Given the high rates of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) production and ciprofloxacin resistance in Turkey, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of the ST131 clone in clinical E. coli isolates from community-acquired and healthcare-associated infections. Methods: E. coli isolates obtained from various clinical specimens submitted to our laboratory between June and September 2018 were analyzed. Bacterial identification and detection of the ST131 clone were performed using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Community acquired and healthcare-associated infections were defined according to the Friedman criteria. Our study was designed as a prospective and descriptive study. Results: A total of 700 E. coli isolates were included in the study. Among these, 224 (32%) were identified as ESBL producers, and 240 (34.3%) belonged to the ST131 clone. ESBL production as well as resistance to ciprofloxacin and various other antimicrobials were significantly more frequent among ST131 isolates. Notably, all three carbapenemase-producing isolates were also identified as ST131.The ST131 clone was identified in 34.7% (103/296) of isolates from community-acquired infections and in 33.9% (137/404) of isolates from healthcare-associated infections, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups ( P = 0.807). Conclusion: In conclusion, the ST131 clone was detected at a high rate among clinical E. coli isolates, with comparable frequencies in both healthcare-associated and community-acquired infections. Given its association with ESBL production and multidrug resistance, continuous detection and surveillance of this high-risk clone are essential for guiding effective strategies to control antimicrobial resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kına et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: