Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The speed of voluntary movements varies systematically, with some individuals moving consistently faster than others across different actions. These variations, conceptualized as vigor, reflect a time–effort–accuracy tradeoff in motor planning. How do two mechanically coupled partners with different individual vigors collaborate, e.g. to move a table together? Here, we show that such dyads coordinate goal-directed movements with minimal interaction force, exhibiting a dyadic vigor with similar characteristics as individual vigor. The emerging dyadic motor plan is strongly influenced by the slower partner, whose vigor predicts dyadic vigor, with effects lasting beyond practice. Computational modeling with stochastic optimal control reveals the critical role of partners’ movement timing uncertainty and vigor in shaping coordination, allowing us to predict dyadic movements from individual behavior across diverse conditions. These findings shed light on the mechanisms underlying human collaboration and may be used in applications ranging from physical training and rehabilitation to collaborative robotics for manufacturing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verdel et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: