Why the study?
To assess the diagnostic performance of cardiac point-of-care ultrasound performed by pediatric emergency medicine physicians in children with preexisting cardiac disease.
Does cardiac POCUS performed by PEM physicians accurately diagnose pericardial effusion and left ventricular systolic dysfunction compared to expert review in children with preexisting cardiac disease?
Does cardiac POCUS performed by PEM physicians accurately diagnose pericardial effusion and left ventricular systolic dysfunction compared to expert review in children with preexisting cardiac disease?
Cardiac POCUS performed by pediatric emergency medicine physicians demonstrates excellent sensitivity and specificity for detecting pericardial effusion and LV systolic dysfunction in children with preexisting cardiac disease.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to assess diagnostic performance of cardiac point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) performed by pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians in children with preexisting cardiac disease. METHODS: We evaluated the use of cardiac POCUS performed by PEM physicians among a convenience sample of children with preexisting cardiac disease presenting to a tertiary care pediatric ED. We assessed patient characteristics and the indication for POCUS. The test characteristics of the sonologist interpretation for the assessment of both pericardial effusion as well as left ventricular systolic dysfunction were compared with expert POCUS review by PEM physicians with POCUS fellowship training. RESULTS: A total of 104 children with preexisting cardiac disease underwent cardiac POCUS examinations between July 2015 and December 2017. Among children with preexisting cardiac disease, structural defects were present in 72%, acquired conditions in 22%, and arrhythmias in 13% of patients. Cardiac POCUS was most frequently obtained because of chest pain (55%), dyspnea (18%), tachycardia (17%), and syncope (10%). Cardiac POCUS interpretation compared with expert review had a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85.7-100) for pericardial effusion and 100% (95% CI, 71.5-100) for left ventricular systolic dysfunction; specificity was 97.5% (95% CI, 91.3.1-99.7) for pericardial effusion and 98.9% (95% CI, 93.8-99.8) for left ventricular systolic dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac POCUS demonstrates good sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing pericardial effusion and left ventricular systolic dysfunction in children with preexisting cardiac conditions when technically adequate studies are obtained. These findings support future studies of cardiac POCUS in children with preexisting cardiac conditions presenting to the ED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoffmann et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: