Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reactions of di-µ-chloro-bridged cyclopalladated compounds [{[graphic omitted]R′)Fe(η5-C5H5)](µ-Cl)}2](R = H, Ph or Me, R′= CH2Ph; R = H, R′= CH2CH2Ph) with alkynes R″CCR″(R″= Et or Ph) have been studied. In all cases these reactions produce nine-membered metallocycles [[graphic omitted]R′)]Fe(η5-C5H5)}Cl](R″= Et or Ph), which arise from a double insertion of the alkyne. Compounds [[graphic omitted]CH2Ph)]Fe(η5-C5H5)}Cl](R = H 4a or Me 4d) have been characterized structurally. Complex 4a is monoclinic, space group C2/c, with a= 30.783(4), b= 11.320(2), c= 20.181(3)Å and β= 127.23(3)°; compound 4d is also monoclinic space group P21/a, with a= 20.308(4), b= 11.075(2), c= 12.565(2)Å and β= 92.01(3)°. These structural studies confirm the existence of a bicyclic system arising from the fusion of a nine-membered ring and the C5H3 moiety of the ferrocenyl moiety. The differences observed in the reactivity of the σ(Pd–Csp2, ferrocene) bond in the cyclopalladated compounds [{[graphic omitted]R′)Fe(η5-C5H5)](µ-Cl)}2](R = H, Ph or Me) and in [{[graphic omitted]Me2}Fe(η5-C5H5)](µ-Cl)}2] can be explained in terms of the electron donor ability of the chelated ligand. This property is reflected mainly in the redox potential of the iron centre.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
López et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: