High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Biocomposites from bio-based poly(butylene succinate) (BioPBS) and grape pomace (GP) were made by melt extrusion–injection molding. Grape pomace is a low value byproduct from the wine industry that can be utilized as a filler to increase its value and to decrease the amount of polymer required in a composite blend. Experiments were performed with up to 50% grape pomace by weight. Composites were also compatibilized with in situ manufactured maleic anhydride-grafted BioPBS (MA- g -BioPBS). Flexural and impact strength were improved with the addition of GP up to the addition of 50 wt % GP, suggesting that at this loading the formulation reached threshold performance. The blend of (57:40:3) BioPBS/GP/MA- g -BioPBS showed the best overall performance in terms of a balance of both mechanical properties and thermal properties. The increase in impact resistance confirmed that the GP acted as a reinforcing phase. The addition of 3 wt % MA- g -BioPBS in samples containing 40 wt % of grape pomace resulted in improvements of 28.4 and 59% in flexural and impact strengths, respectively, compared to neat BioPBS. Heat distortion temperature increased with the addition of grape pomace by 14.3% in a blend combination of 57% BioPBS, 40% grape pomace, and 3% MA- g -BioPBS compared to neat BioPBS. Scanning electron microscopy results show improved interfacial adhesion with the addition of MA- g -BioPBS and thermogravimetric analysis results prove that the GP is thermally stable under the processing conditions. This study shows that GP can be successfully incorporated into a BioPBS matrix to create biocomposites with improved thermal and mechanical properties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gowman et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: