Why the study?
The predictive value of the AHEAD score for all-cause death compared to the CHADS2 score in patients with coronary artery disease was unknown.
Does the AHEAD score improve prediction of all-cause death compared to the CHADS2 score in patients undergoing PCI for acute or chronic coronary syndromes?
Does the AHEAD score improve prediction of all-cause death compared to the CHADS2 score in patients undergoing PCI for acute or chronic coronary syndromes?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The AHEAD score offers superior prognostic value for all-cause mortality compared to the CHADS2 score in patients undergoing PCI for coronary artery disease.
Background The AHEAD (A: atrial fibrillation; H: hemoglobin; E: elderly; A: abnormal renal parameters; D: diabetes mellitus) score was developed to predict all-cause death (ACD) in patients with heart failure. However, its predictive value for ACD compared to the CHADS 2 score in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) remains unknown. Methods This retrospective multicenter cohort study analyzed data of the patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for acute (ACS) or chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) using the Clinical Deep Data Accumulation System (CLIDAS) database. The AHEAD score was calculated by assigning 1 point each for atrial fibrillation, anemia, age >70 years, elevated creatinine levels (>130 μmol/L), and diabetes mellitus. Results In total, 9033 patients were enrolled between April 2013 and March 2019. Cox multivariate analysis revealed that both the AHEAD and CHADS 2 scores were independently associated with ACD in patients with ACS and CCS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.91 [95% CI, 1.70–2.14] for ACS and 1.72 [1.54–1.92] for CCS, and HR 1.17 [1.06–1.29] for ACS and 1.18 [1.08–1.29] for CCS, respectively). However, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that the AHEAD score had a significantly higher predictive value for ACD compared to the CHADS 2 score in both ACS and CCS. A significant difference was found in the rate of ACD among patients stratified by the AHEAD score in both groups. Conclusions The AHEAD score demonstrated superior predictive value for ACD compared to the CHADS 2 score in patients with CAD, regardless of whether they had ACS or CCS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tamaki et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: