This paper describes a new non-parametric model to estimate space use. We test the similarity in space use patterns between an artificially generated utilization distribution (Seaman- UD) and the model estimates for five different sample sizes. Three different test statistics (Kappa,gamma,Tc) reveal a high similarity between the estimates and the Seaman-UD. The tests also show that, beyond a certain threshold value, larger sample sizes do not return significantly better results. W e further demonstrate that the Thiessen model delineated areas of intensive use more effectively in a home range than Kernel estimators. UD estimation uses AML (ArcInfo Macro Language), thus facilitating overlay operations with habitat information stored in the same ArcInfo GIS environment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Casaer et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: