Why the study?
Shensong Yangxin is widely utilized in arrhythmia treatment, but its clinical advantages for persistent atrial fibrillation needed assessment.
Does Shensong Yangxin combined with conventional treatments reduce the recurrence of AF in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Does Shensong Yangxin combined with conventional treatments reduce the recurrence of AF in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shensong Yangxin as an adjunctive treatment to conventional therapy may significantly reduce the recurrence of atrial fibrillation in patients with persistent AF.
Background Shensong Yangxin (SSYX), a standardized Chinese preparation, is widely utilized in arrhythmia treatment. This research sought to assess the clinical advantages of SSYX for persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF). Methods We searched seven databases and two registries to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing SSYX as an adjunctive treatment for PsAF. We assessed methodological quality with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0, and conducted meta-analyses with RevMan 5.4. Results The meta-analysis incorporated ten RCTs enrolling 1,713 patients with PsAF. SSYX combined with conventional treatments (CTs) significantly lowered the recurrence of AF compared to CTs alone (risk ratio [ RR ] = 0.65, 95% conffdence interval [ CI ] 0.56 to 0.75, P < 0.001). The results also showed that SSYX contributed to the reduction of left atrial diameter ( MD = −1.41, 95% CI -2.48 to −0.34, P < 0.001) and P-wave dispersion ( MD = −10.37, 95% CI -17.23 to −3.5, P = 0.003). Safety analysis revealed that the combination of SSYX and CTs decreased adverse reaction incidence ( RR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.90, P = 0.02). The certainty of evidence was graded as moderate to low. Conclusion SSYX showed potential in preventing AF recurrence in PsAF patients. Nevertheless, these preliminary findings require validation through more rigorously designed trials, given methodological limitations impacting evidence certainty. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251008974 , identifier CRD420251008974.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: