An understanding of the improvements achieved in the use of cosolvents for methylammonium lead triiodide (MAPbI 3 ):C 70 blend films (MAPbI 3:C 70 ) processing is presented. A comparative study using aromatic (i.e., o -xylene and o -dichlorobenzene) and aliphatic (i.e., methylcyclohexane and chlorocyclohexane) cosolvents proves the nature of the cosolvent interacting with fullerene to be determining for achieving enhanced devices. UV–vis spectra of the different C 70 solutions suggest a major impact of the solute–aromatic solvent interactions on the optoelectronic properties. The effect of aromatic and aliphatic solvents in the electronic structure of C 70 crystals, obtained from the different solutions, is indeed demonstrated by electron energy loss spectroscopy. Morphological studies show elimination of pinholes (field emission scanning electron microscopy) and different nanometric features related to fullerene (atomic force microscopy) in MAPbI 3:C 70 blend films processed using aromatic cosolvents. A severe quenching of the perovskite emission is observed, suggesting that electron transfer happens from MAPbI 3 to C 70 in the MAPbI 3:C 70 blend films. Furthermore, a faster charge transfer seems to occur in blend films processed using aromatic cosolvents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pascual et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: