This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare fluctuations of central subfield retinal thickness (CSRT) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration undergoing ranibizumab pro re nata versus aflibercept bimonthly treatment in a prospective 12 month, phase IV, randomised, multicentre study. METHODS: Ranibizumab was administered according to best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and/or disease activity detected on spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Aflibercept was administered at three initial monthly visits followed by bimonthly treatment. CSRT stability was evaluated between months 3 and 6. CSRT stability was compared between groups and correlated with functional outcomes at month 12. RESULTS: Fluctuations of CSRT showed a least-squares (LS) mean (95% CI) difference of -4.12 (-10.22 to 1.98) µm between ranibizumab (25.16 (20.09 to 30.24) µm) and aflibercept groups (29.28 (24.14 to 34.43) µm) (p=0.1850). A predefined analysis of retinal stability, adjusted for baseline CSRT, showed a LS mean (95% CI) difference of -6.53 (-12.47 to -0.58 µm) in favour of ranibizumab (23.53 (18.58 to 28.49) µm) versus aflibercept (30.06 (25.04 to 35.07) µm) (p=0.0315). Pearson's correlation coefficient demonstrated no correlation between the mean amplitude of CSRT fluctuation between months 3 and 6, and BCVA at month 12 (r = -0.0888). Adverse event rates were low. CONCLUSIONS: Numerical differences in retinal thickness fluctuations between months 3 and 6 were detected between treatment regimens. While the presence of fluctuations has previously been shown to have a negative impact on functional outcomes, our data showed no correlation between the mean amplitude of fluctuations and functional outcomes at month 12.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agostini et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: