We examined transgenic-cattle production by DNA microinjection into 1-, 2-, and 4-cell embryos, analyzing the impact on calf size and subsequent viability. Embryos were either collected at an abattoir by flushing oviducts from superovulated and artificially inseminated cows (in vivo-derived) or obtained by in vitro maturation and in vitro fertilization of oocytes aspirated from excised ovaries (in vitro-derived). A human serum albumin (hSA) milk-expression DNA construct was microinjected, either in one of the visible pronuclei of in vitro- and in vivo-derived 1-cell embryos or in the nuclei of two blastomeres of 2- and 4-cell in vivo-derived embryos. Microinjection-induced mortality (lysis and developmental block) was equivalent ( approximately 40%) for all microinjected embryos. Embryos were co-cultured with BRL cells in B-2 medium containing 10% fetal calf serum (FSC). Overall, embryo development to morulae/blastocysts was significantly greater for in vivo-derived ova (15.5%) than for in vitro-derived oocytes (9.3%). All morulae and blastocysts were transferred to synchronized recipient females on Days 6-8 post-fertilization. A total of 189 calves were delivered. Birth weights were significantly greater for calves generated from in vitro-derived oocytes compared with those generated from in vivo-derived oocytes. One transgenic bull calf was obtained from the microinjection of a 2-cell embryo. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of lymphocytes detected one transgenic integration site in all cells. Transmission frequency of the hSA transgene in embryos obtained through IVM/IVF/IVC utilizing the semen of the transgenic calf confirmed that it was not mosaic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Behboodi et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: