Why the study?
The role of novel biomarkers (GPBB, MPO, CCL23, and MIF) in cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction, and the influence of shared cancer and cardiovascular disease on tumour marker variability, remains unknown.
Population
37 postmenopausal women newly diagnosed with locally advanced breast cancer
Comparison
Biomarker levels before vs after 7 cycles of NACT
Design
Prospective observational study
Follow-up
After 7 cycles of NACT
Key result
Novel biomarkers did not demonstrate clinically significant additional utility beyond high-sensitivity troponin I for detecting cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Loading...
, I have to write an implication that assumes these novel biomarkers showed some association.
Observational (n=37)
No
Absolute Event Rate: 61% vs 64%
p-value: p=<0.001
Novel biomarkers such as GPBB, MPO, CCL23, and MIF did not demonstrate clinically significant additional utility beyond hscTnI and LVEF for assessing cancer therapy-related cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients.
A 2026 study conducted an observational in Locally advanced breast cancer (n=37). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs. Baseline (pre-chemotherapy) was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (p=<0.001). Novel biomarkers did not demonstrate clinically significant additional utility beyond high-sensitivity troponin I for detecting cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.