Assesses structural targets in Tibet, suggesting promising exploration zones.
The Duolong district in the central Bangong-Nujiang Suture Zone (BNSZ) is a major porphyry–epithermal Cu-Au cluster in Tibet. We combine radially averaged log-power spectra with a five-level db4 two-dimensional discrete wavelet transform (2D-DWT) to compare depth-sensitive frequency bands with their plan-view expressions in complete Bouguer gravity and reduced-to-the-pole (RTP) aeromagnetic grids. The five-level transform yields signed detail reconstructions d1–d5, ordered from fine to coarse scales, and a final cumulative low-pass approximation a5. The gravity/magnetic spectral estimates are 1.02/1.09 km for the shallow ensemble, 5.12/4.85 km for the intermediate ensemble, and 18.60/21.58 km for the deepest resolved ensemble. These values describe statistical source-depth ranges rather than discrete interfaces. The 2.98 km difference between the deep-source estimates (14.8% of the paired mean) is treated as methodological uncertainty and/or a difference in the depths of the density and magnetization transitions rather than as quantitative identity. The coarsest detail d5 and low-pass approximation a5 express a broad upper-to-middle-crustal background transition and do not image the Moho or a mantle source. Co-located mid-scale gravity and magnetic anomalies are consistent with a composite intrusive–basement source region, but the absence of site-specific density and susceptibility measurements prevents a unique lithological assignment. A southeastern anomaly zone centered approximately at 84.0° E, 31.7° N is therefore presented as a first-order regional screening hypothesis within a broad 3–8 km source-depth band, not as a quantitatively closed drill target. The interpretation distinguishes geophysical observations from geological hypotheses and explicitly incorporates the limitations of spectral and wavelet separation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2026 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: