Why the study?
Does ranolazine inhibit shear stress mechanosensitivity of Na(+) current and spontaneous action potentials in cultured HL-1 cells?
Does ranolazine inhibit shear stress mechanosensitivity of Na(+) current and spontaneous action potentials in cultured HL-1 cells?
Ranolazine inhibits shear stress-induced increases in Na(+) current and action potential frequency in HL-1 cells, providing a potential mechanism for its antiarrhythmic effects.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ranolazine may blunt shear-induced Na current changes in atrial cells; leaves open relevance to clinical antiarrhythmic effects.
Na(V)1.5 is a mechanosensitive voltage-gated Na(+) channel encoded by the gene SCN5A, expressed in cardiac myocytes and required for phase 0 of the cardiac action potential (AP). In the cardiomyocyte, ranolazine inhibits depolarizing Na(+) current and delayed rectifier (I(Kr)) currents. Recently, ranolazine was also shown to be an inhibitor of Na(V)1.5 mechanosensitivity. Stretch also accelerates the firing frequency of the SA node, and fluid shear stress increases the beating rate of cultured cardiomyocytes in vitro. However, no cultured cell platform exists currently for examination of spontaneous electrical activity in response to mechanical stimulation. In the present study, flow of solution over atrial myocyte-derived HL-1 cultured cells was used to study shear stress mechanosensitivity of Na(+) current and spontaneous, endogenous rhythmic action potentials. In voltage-clamped HL-1 cells, bath flow increased peak Na(+) current by 14 ± 5%. In current-clamped cells, bath flow increased the frequency and decay rate of AP by 27 ± 12% and 18 ± 4%, respectively. Ranolazine blocked both responses to shear stress. This study suggests that cultured HL-1 cells are a viable in vitro model for detailed study of the effects of mechanical stimulation on spontaneous cardiac action potentials. Inhibition of the frequency and decay rate of action potentials in HL-1 cells are potential mechanisms behind the antiarrhythmic effect of ranolazine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Strege et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: