Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Study enhances lung cancer subtype classification in a diverse population, suggesting improved diagnostic accuracy.
The lack of demographically diverse datasets remains a major barrier to the deployment of computational pathology models in real-world clinical settings. To address this gap, we introduce and release the Indian Pathology Dataset for Lung Cancer (IPD-LUNG), a curated histopathology dataset comprising 311 high-resolution hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) whole slide images (WSIs) of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) from an Indian cohort. Using this dataset, we develop and evaluate a comprehensive computational framework for lung cancer subtyping based on histopathology foundation model representations. We investigate two complementary classification pipelines: a weakly supervised multiple instance learning (MIL) framework and an unsupervised phenotype discovery followed by supervised classification pipeline that constructs slide-level representations using Leiden clustering. On the IPD-LUNG dataset, the weakly supervised MIL framework achieves an accuracy of 0.916 and AUC of 0.912, while the phenotype discovery pipeline attains a competitive accuracy of 0.867 and AUC of 0.903, despite relying on label-free feature construction. Cross-dataset evaluation with TCGA-NSCLC further demonstrates strong generalization across populations and acquisition settings. Together, these results highlight the robustness of foundation model representations and demonstrate a scalable and interpretable framework for lung cancer subtyping.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Padariya et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: