Reflective practice using clay enhances cognitive clarity and professional development, suggesting a shift in academic culture.
This article reflects on the integration of clay-based reflective practice into academic life, proposing it as a viable, restorative, and cognitively clarifying tool. Amidst the fast-paced demands of contemporary academic roles, where productivity, digital saturation, and continuous output dominate, we argue for the incorporation of tactile, materially engaged methods to support deeper thinking, clarity, and relational connection. Drawing on our shared experiences of using clay in dialogical reflective practice, we position this practice not as ancillary or recreational, but as central to professional development and sustainable academic work culture. Informed by posthuman feminist materialism and ethics of care, clay-based practices offer a rhythm of pause and reorientation that facilitates insight often bypassed in text-based reflection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: