Systematic review summarizes evolving criteria for industrial site selection, suggesting regular updates are essential.
Research on industrial location criteria has grown since the first industrial revolution, revealing key factors for choosing sites for industrial parks. However, macro-elements like economy, culture, and technology continuously reshape these criteria. Most existing studies focus on specific factors, indicating a need for a comprehensive synthesis. This study employs systematic literature review (SLR) methodology following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. to analyze scientific information and aim to summarize essential criteria for selecting industrial zones. Following the screening and eligibility assessment process, 182 full-text studies were reviewed, with 60 recent publications emphasized for synthesizing current evidence, complemented by 56 supplementary references to support theoretical and contextual analysis. Findings include: (1) the need for frequent updates to criteria in response to global economic and scientific trends; (2) traditional factors like natural resources, transportation systems, costs, and population density remain significant; and (3) of the identified criteria organized into six main evaluation factors, public health emerged as an important one, especially highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the potential for project failures due to overlooked criteria, regularly reviewing and updating industrial location considerations is essential and can serve as a valuable resource for future research and practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoang-Thi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: