Why the study?
Making the diagnosis of AHF in the prehospital setting is difficult despite early diagnosis and optimization of therapies being crucial to improving outcomes.
How accurate is prehospital paramedic diagnosis of acute heart failure in adult patients presenting with acute dyspnea?
How accurate is prehospital paramedic diagnosis of acute heart failure in adult patients presenting with acute dyspnea?
Prehospital paramedics demonstrate poor sensitivity (14%) for diagnosing acute heart failure in dyspneic patients, highlighting a significant gap in prehospital identification and treatment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low prehospital AHF sensitivity risks missed cases; leaves open whether training or tools improve accuracy.
Introduction Early diagnosis and optimization of heart failure therapies in patients with acute heart failure (AHF), including in the prehospital setting, is crucial to improving outcomes. However, making the diagnosis of AHF in the prehospital setting is difficult. The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of prehospital diagnosis (AHF versus not heart failure [HF]) in patients with acute dyspnea when compared to final hospital diagnosis. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of adult patients transported by emergency medical services (EMS) with a primary or secondary complaint of shortness of breath. Patients were identified through an EMS electronic database (ESO) and matched to their hospital encounter. ESO was reviewed for prehospital diagnosis and management. Hospital electronic medical records were reviewed to determine final hospital diagnosis, management in the emergency department and hospital, disposition, and length of stay. The primary outcome compared prehospital diagnosis to final hospital diagnosis, which served as our criterion standard. Results Of 199 included patients, 50 (25%) had a final diagnosis of AHF. Prehospital paramedic sensitivity and accuracy for AHF were 14% (7/50; confidence interval [CI] 0.06-0.26) and 77% (CI 0.70-0.82), respectively. In the 50 patients with AHF, 14 (28%) received nitroglycerin in the prehospital setting, while 27 (54.0%) patients were inappropriately treated with albuterol. Conclusion Prehospital paramedics had poor sensitivity and moderate accuracy for the diagnosis of AHF. A small percentage of patients ultimately diagnosed with AHF had HF therapy initiated in the prehospital setting. This data highlights the fact that AHF is difficult to diagnose in the prehospital setting and is commonly missed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Supples et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: