Why the study?
This study aimed to identify gender-related differences in multiple cardiovascular disease treatments and overview possible causes to aid in establishing a cardiovascular disease risk profile.
What are the gender differences in acute care treatments, symptom presentation, and burden of cardiovascular diseases?
What are the gender differences in acute care treatments, symptom presentation, and burden of cardiovascular diseases?
This narrative review highlights persistent gender differences in the presentation and treatment of cardiovascular disease, emphasizing the need for gender-specific risk assessments and management strategies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports awareness of gender differences in CVD; leaves open whether tailored strategies improve outcomes.
Background/aims This narrative review aimed to identify gender-related differences in multiple cardiovascular disease treatments and to provide an overview of the possible causes to aid in establishment of a cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk profile. Methods A narrative review methodology was used. A systematic search of two databases, PubMed and CINAHL, sourced 245 articles. Results Seven articles met the inclusion criteria. Three recurrent themes emerged from the literature. These were gender differences in the burden of CVD, gender differences in symptom presentation and gender differences in management and treatment of CVD. Conclusions CVD can be expressed differently in women and men. Different approaches to diagnosis and treatment are required. The studies included in this review reflect findings reported in research conducted more than 10 years ago, suggesting that more focus is needed to define and add gender-related indicators to current risk assessments and management strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Girleanu et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: