Molecular conformation has a striking function in dominating the molecular orientation, crystallinity, charge mobility, film morphology, and photovoltaic performance for classic donor−π–acceptor (D−π–A) type copolymers. Herein, we systematically investigate this correlation by modulating the chemical structures of conjugated polymers composed of a new emerging electron-donating building block of 4,8-bis(4-chlorothiophen-2-yl)benzo[1,2- b:4,5- b ′]dithiophene (BDT-T-Cl). A D−π–A type copolymer PE31 is synthesized as the reference donor polymer, where BDT-T-Cl, benzotriazole (BTA), and thiophene (T) units are used as the D, A, and π-bridge, respectively. PE31 realizes a moderate power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 7.62% when paired with a nonfullerene acceptor Y6 . The methoxy substitutes in the BTA unit leads to a twisted backbone conformation of the final polymer PE32, which has negative effects on the charge transport and results in a slightly reduced PCE of 7.31%. The intra/interchain noncovalent interactions can be modulated by importing fluorine atoms on the BTA unit ( J52-Cl ) and further changing the π-bridge from thiophene to 3-hexylthieno[3,2- b ]thiophene ( PE4 ). The backbone of PE4 can be changed to a linear conformation, different from the zigzagged conformation of the other three polymers with thiophene as the π-bridge. PE4: Y6 shows the highest PCE of 14.02% with the highest fill factor (FF) of 0.75, superior to J52-Cl: Y6 combination (PCE = 12.31% and FF = 0.61). Our results clearly indicate that changing the backbone conformation by π-bridge engineering has an important significance of achieving the optimal active layer morphology and promising photovoltaic performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: