Nanocrystals of pure, Cu 2+ and Fe 3+ doped SnO 2 have been prepared by a sol−gel route and were investigated by a combination of EXAFS and XRPD measurements. Surface doped samples were also studied, and these were prepared by immersing pure nanocrystals in aqueous solutions of the dopant cations. The XRPD results showed the average size of the crystallites when freshly prepared was 2−3 nm and was not affected by the dopant. The Sn K-edge EXAFS of the pure SnO 2 nanocrystals was consistent with their size and suggested the level of disorder in the crystallites was comparable to that in bulk SnO 2 . The K-edge EXAFS of the dopants showed that up to at least 10 mol % nominal doping of both Cu 2+ and Fe 3+ ions in sol−gel prepared samples were situated on Sn 4+ sites in the SnO 2 cassiterite lattice. In the case of the surface doped samples the EXAFS showed no penetration of the dopant into the SnO 2 lattice. The growth of the crystallites on heating was monitored by XRPD and was found to become clearly evident at about 400 °C. The effect of the dopants was to lower the growth rate of the nanocrystals. Heating the doped sol−gel prepared samples yielded EXAFS spectra that indicated the dopants gradually moved to surface regions of the crystallites. In the case of the nominally 10 mol % Fe 3+ doped sample, heating for 1 h at 900 °C caused the precipitation of iron oxide. Heating the surface doped samples up to 900 °C did not cause a penetration of the dopant into the SnO 2 lattice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davis et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: