Both methane (CH 4 ) and acetylene (C 2 H 2 ) are important energy source and raw chemicals in many industrial processes. The development of an energy-efficient and environmentally friendly separation and purification strategy for CH 4 and C 2 H 2 is necessary. Ultramicroporous metal–organic framework (MOF) materials have shown great success in the separation and purification of small-molecule gases. Herein, the synergy effect of tritopic polytetrazolate and ditopic terephthalate ligands successfully generates a series of isoreticular ultramicroporous cadmium tetrazolate–carboxylate MOF materials (SNNU-13–16) with excellent CH 4 and C 2 H 2 purification performance. Except for the uncoordinated tetrazolate N atoms serving as Lewis base sites, the pore size and pore surface of MOFs are systematically engineered by regulating dicarboxylic acid ligands varying from OH-BDC (SNNU-13) to Br-BDC (SNNU-14) to NH 2 -BDC (SNNU-15) to 1,4-NDC (SNNU-16). Benefiting from the ultramicroporous character (3.8–5.9 Å), rich Lewis base N sites, and tunable pore environments, all of these ultramicroporous MOFs exhibit a prominent separation capacity for carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) or C2 hydrocarbons from CH 4 and C 2 H 2 . Remarkably, SNNU-16 built by 1,4-NDC shows the highest ideal adsorbed solution theory CO 2 /CH 4, ethylene (C 2 H 4 )/CH 4, and C 2 H 2 /CH 4 separation selectivity values, which are higher than those of most famous MOFs with or without open metal sites. Dynamic breakthrough experiments show that SNNU-16 can also efficiently separate the C 2 H 2 /CO 2 mixtures with a gas flow rate of 4 mL min –1 under 1 bar and 298 K. The breakthrough time (18 min g –1 ) surpasses most best-gas-separation MOFs and nearly all other metal azolate–carboxylate MOF materials under the same conditions. The above prominently CH 4 and C 2 H 2 purification abilities of SNNU-13–16 materials were further confirmed by the Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: