Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1)-deficient mice are protected against septic shock, diabetes type I, stroke, and inflammation. We report that primary cells from PARP-1(-/-) animals are impaired in kappa B-dependent transcriptional activation induced by different stimuli involved in inflammatory and genotoxic stress signaling. PARP-1 was also required for p65-mediated transcriptional activation. PARP-1 enzymatic inhibitors did not inhibit the transcriptional activation of a kappa B-dependent reporter gene in wild type cells. Remarkably, neither the enzymatic activity nor the DNA binding activity of PARP-1 was required for kappa B-dependent transcriptional activation in PARP-1(-/-) cells complemented with different PARP-1 mutants. However, PARP-1 interacted in vitro directly with both subunits of NF-kappa B (p50 and p65), and mapping of the interaction domains revealed that both subunits bind to different PARP-1 domains. Furthermore, a PARP-1 mutant lacking the enzymatic and DNA binding activity interacted comparably to the wild type PARP-1 with p65 or p50. Finally, we showed that PARP-1 is activating the natural inducible nitric-oxide synthase and P-selectin promoter in a kappa B-dependent manner upon stimulation of the cells with inflammatory stimuli or cotransfection of p65. Our results provide evidence that neither the DNA binding nor the enzymatic activity of PARP-1 but its direct protein-protein interaction with both subunits of NF-kappa B is required for its coactivator function, thus expanding the role of PARP-1 as an essential and novel classical transcriptional coactivator for kappa B-dependent gene expression in vivo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hassa et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: