Key result
Fault tree analysis identified 105 faults contributing to postoperative BSI, with only 14 mandated for reporting to NSQIP, 5 to CMS, and 3 to JC.
Systematic Review (n=90)
Current national quality data reporting programs show substantial variation and may lack comprehensive data collection needed to identify root causes of postoperative bloodstream infections.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
National reporting programs may miss most contributors to postoperative BSI; challenges adequacy of NSQIP/CMS/JC metrics for root-cause identification.
The purpose of this study was to use fault tree analysis to evaluate the adequacy of quality reporting programs in identifying root causes of postoperative bloodstream infection (BSI). A systematic review of the literature was used to construct a fault tree to evaluate 3 postoperative BSI reporting programs: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), and The Joint Commission (JC). The literature review revealed 699 eligible publications, 90 of which were used to create the fault tree containing 105 faults. A total of 14 identified faults are currently mandated for reporting to NSQIP, 5 to CMS, and 3 to JC; 2 or more programs require 4 identified faults. The fault tree identifies numerous contributing faults to postoperative BSI and reveals substantial variation in the requirements and ability of national quality data reporting programs to capture these potential faults. Efforts to prevent postoperative BSI require more comprehensive data collection to identify the root causes and develop high-reliability improvement strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McElroy et al. (2015) conducted a systematic review in Postoperative bloodstream infection (BSI) (n=90). Quality reporting programs (NSQIP, CMS, JC) was evaluated on Identified faults mandated for reporting. Fault tree analysis identified 105 faults contributing to postoperative BSI, with only 14 mandated for reporting to NSQIP, 5 to CMS, and 3 to JC.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: