Why the study?
When clinical suspicion of STEMI is high, coronary angiography may unexpectedly be unrevealing.
Case Report (n=1)
Highlights the diagnostic dilemma of STEMI mimics where clinical suspicion is high but coronary angiography reveals no culprit occlusion.
Urges caution attributing STEMI to non-critical lesions in dehydrated patients; leaves open OCT's role in guiding therapy for mimics.
The etiology of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is either rupture or erosion of unstable plaque with subsequent thrombosis. With the widespread use of plaque-stabilizing lipid-lowering therapies (statins), plaque erosion, rather than rupture, now accounts for most cases of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). In the spectrum of ACS, STEMI usually results from the total occlusion of the culprit epicardial coronary artery, leading to the occlusion of blood flow to the affected myocardium. The differential diagnosis of ST-elevations on electrocardiograms are broad. However, an elevated cardiac marker, evidence of wall motion abnormality on echocardiogram or positive stress testing makes an alternate diagnosis less likely. This prompts emergent coronary angiography with an intent to fix the underlying cause. In some cases like ours, when the clinical suspicion of STEMI is high, the coronary angiography may be unrevealing of the diagnosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmed et al. (2020) conducted a case report in ST-elevation myocardial infarction mimic (n=1). Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: