The precise roles of the calcium and lipid pathways in TRH-stimulated PRL secretion from rat pituitary (GH3) cells are controversial. In particular, it is debated whether elevation of cytoplasmic free Ca2+ concentration [( Ca2+]i) is sufficient to cause burst secretion (0-2 min) or whether an increase in 1,2-diacylglycerol must accompany the Ca2+ elevation. In this study, the effects of TRH, which elevates 1,2-diacylglycerol, on [Ca2+]i and stimulation of burst secretion were compared with those of depolarization by high extracellular K+, which does not increase 1,2-diacylglycerol. A maximal concentration of TRH (1 microM) and depolarization by 17.5 mM K+ caused elevation of [Ca2+]i from the resting level of 140 +/- 20 nM to 470 +/- 70 nM and 514 +/- 60 nM, respectively, and stimulated burst secretion from 0.6 +/- 0.2 ng/10(6) cells/min to 3.3 +/- 0.8 and 3.1 +/- 0.4 ng/10(6) cells/min, respectively, when a small component of TRH-stimulated secretion that is independent of elevation of [Ca2+]i was subtracted. A detailed comparison of multiple levels to which [Ca2+]i was elevated (up to 600 nM) and the degree of stimulation of burst phase secretion demonstrated the same positive linear correlation (correlation coefficient = 0.96) for TRH and K+ depolarization. Hence, elevation of [Ca2+]i is sufficient to cause burst secretion irrespective of elevation of 1,2-diacylglycerol. Optimal stimulation by TRH of sustained secretion of PRL did not depend on elevation of [Ca2+]i; sustained PRL secretion stimulated by 10 nM TRH was 2.6 +/- 0.4 and 2.7 +/- 0.2 ng/10(6) cells/min in control cells and arachidonic acid-pretreated cells in which [Ca2+]i was not elevated, respectively. The data from this and previous studies demonstrate that elevation of [Ca2+]i and 1,2-diacylglycerol may act coordinately, but not synergistically, to mediate TRH stimulation of PRL secretion from GH3 cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kolesnick et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: