Key result
An increase in ticagrelor use over time was associated with a lower rate of ischemic stroke following acute myocardial infarction, demonstrating a 13% reduction in relative hazard compared to a clopidogrel-only cohort (HR 0.87).
Why the study?
To evaluate the impact of a rapid change in preferred treatment from clopidogrel to ticagrelor on the risk of ischemic stroke following acute myocardial infarction.
Does the introduction of ticagrelor reduce the risk of ischemic stroke in patients following acute myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=47,674)
Yes
Does the introduction of ticagrelor reduce the risk of ischemic stroke in patients following acute myocardial infarction?
The introduction of ticagrelor and improved management of AMI was associated with a 13% relative risk reduction in ischemic stroke at one year.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ticagrelor adoption may lower post-AMI stroke risk; hypothesis-generating observational data requiring RCT confirmation before practice change.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of a rapid change in preferred treatment from clopidogrel to ticagrelor on the risk of ischemic stroke following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: Data for AMI patients treated with either clopidogrel or ticagrelor were obtained from the Swedish Register of Information and Knowledge about Swedish Heart Intensive Care Admissions (RIKS-HIA). Patients were divided into two cohorts, each covering a two-year time period; the initial prescription of ticagrelor (20 Dec 2011) was used as a cut-off point. Patients in the early cohort (n = 23,447) were treated with clopidogrel, while those in the later cohort (n = 24,227), were treated with either clopidogrel (47.9%) or ticagrelor (52.1%). Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess the risk of ischemic stroke over time, with multivariable Cox regression analyses used to identify predictors of ischemic stroke. RESULTS: Of 47,674 patients, there were 1203 cases of ischemic stroke. Cumulative Kaplan-Meier incidence estimates of ischemic stroke after one year were 2.8% vs. 2.4% for the early and late cohorts, respectively (p = 0.001). Older age, hypertension, diabetes, previous stroke, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and ST-elevation myocardial infarction were associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke. Percutaneous coronary intervention and statins at discharge were associated with a decreased risk of ischemic stroke, as was higher estimated glomerular filtration rate. Membership of the late cohort correlated with a 13% reduction in the relative risk of ischemic stroke. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of ticagrelor as well as an improved management of AMI was associated with a lower rate of ischemic stroke in a relatively unselected AMI population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henriksson et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=47,674). Increased ticagrelor use (late cohort) vs. Clopidogrel only (early cohort) was evaluated on Ischemic stroke after one year (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77-0.99, p=0.03). An increase in ticagrelor use over time was associated with a lower rate of ischemic stroke following acute myocardial infarction, demonstrating a 13% reduction in relative hazard compared to a clopidogrel-only cohort (HR 0.87).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: