// Jian Guan 1, * , Yue Zhang 1, * , Qinyang Li 1 , Yaowei Zhang 1 , Lu Li 1 , Min Chen 1 , Nanjie Xiao 1 , Longhua Chen 1 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China * These authors have contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Jian Guan, email: guanjian5461@163.com Longhua Chen, email: chenlh5461@163.com Keywords: cisplatin, head and neck, cancer, therapy, meta-analysis Received: January 11, 2016 Accepted: August 22, 2016 Published: September 02, 2016 ABSTRACT Purpose: This study was performed to compare the efficacies and acute toxicities in weekly- and three weekly- cisplatin based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for advanced HNC patients. Results: 779 patients of 10 studies were eligible. No difference in the 2-, 3-year OS or 1-, 2-year LRFS was observed, whereas patients in three weekly CCRT arm tended to have a better 5-year OS (HR=1.79, 95%C 0.97-3.31, p=0.06). Weekly arm seemed to show less gastrointestinal toxicities (RR=0.59, 95%CI 0.34-1.02, p=0.06), but similar hematologic toxicity compared to three weekly arm. Subgroup analysis displayed more grade ≥3 mucositis (RR=1.72, p=0.01), and more chemotherapy related delay/interrupt (RR=2.68, p<0.0001) in weekly arm for non-nasopharynx carcinoma (non-NPC) HNC. Methods: We conducted the meta-analysis by searching PubMed, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) with secondary endpoints locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and grade≥3 acute adverse events. RevMan 5.2 was used to perform statistical analyses. Conclusions: Three weekly cisplatin-based CCRT might achieve a higher long-term OS with no significant difference in a shorter OS and LRFS. Weekly arm was associated with less gastrointestinal toxicities but more grade≥3 mucositis and chemotherapy related delay/interrupt. Large randomized trials were urgent to further define superiority of these two regimens.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guan et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: