Why the study?
Does participation in clinical trials delay time to thrombolytic administration in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Does participation in clinical trials delay time to thrombolytic administration in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Participation in clinical trials for acute myocardial infarction is associated with a significant delay in door-to-needle time for thrombolysis.
Trial participation was associated with delayed thrombolysis; leaves open whether protocols need adjustment or affect outcomes.
Objective To determine if there is a significant delay in time to thrombolytic administration for patients participating in clinical trials. Methods A retrospective audit of all patients given a thrombolytic agent for acute myocardial infarction in the Emergency Department of the Gold Coast Hospital in 1995. Results Trial participants (n=17) had a mean door to needle time of 61.9 minutes compared with non trial participants (n=66) whose mean door to needle time was 43.2 minutes. This was found to be statistically significant (p<0.05) and equated to a 43% increase in time to thrombolysis for trial participants. Conclusion Participation in clinical trials leads to a delay in time to thrombolysis for the individual patient which must be weighed against the potential benefit of research trials to the community.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aitken et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: