Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mice were infected with the intracellular bacterium, Listeria monocytogenes, and T cell clones from spleens, lymph nodes and peritoneal exudates were established. The capacity of L3T4+, Lyt2- T-cell clones to specifically lyse L. monocytogenes-infected macrophages was analyzed. As a source of target cells, bone marrow macrophages (BMM phi) after 9 days of culture in hydrophobic teflon bags were used. These BMM phi were totally Ia-; however, significant Ia-expression could be induced by interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma). IFN-gamma-stimulated BMM phi, after priming with live or killed L. monocytogenes organisms were effectively lysed by the vast majority of L3T4+ T cell clones. In the absence of either IFN-gamma stimulation or antigen priming, no lysis occurred. Cytolysis was demonstrable in a conventional 4-h 51Cr-release assay and in an 18-h neutral red uptake assay and was antigen specific and class II restricted. Native T cells from L. monocytogenes-infected mice failed to lyse stimulated, L. monocytogenes-primed BMM phi and gained their cytolytic activity after antigenic restimulation in vitro. These data demonstrate that L. monocytogenes-specific L3T4+ T cells could lyse M phi presenting listerial antigens provided that Ia antigen expression had been induced. L3T4+ T cell clones produced IFN-phi after restimulation with antigen plus accessory cells in vitro and IFN-gamma secretion could be increased by costimulation with recombinant IL 2. These T cell clones conferred significant protection upon recipient mice which was more pronounced in the liver. The possible relevance of lysis by L3T4+ T cells of infected M phi to protection against and pathogenesis of intracellular bacterial infections is discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaufmann et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: