Key result
12 months of edoxaban was superior to 3 months for reducing symptomatic recurrent VTE or VTE-related death in patients with cancer and isolated distal DVT (1.0% vs 7.2%; OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03-0.44).
Why the study?
Evidence was lacking regarding the optimal duration of anticoagulation therapy for isolated distal deep vein thrombosis in patients with cancer, balancing prevention of thrombotic events against bleeding risk.
Does 12-month edoxaban treatment reduce symptomatic recurrent VTE or VTE-related death in patients with cancer with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis compared to 3-month treatment?
RCT (n=601)
Open-label, adjudicator-blinded
1-to-1 ratio
Yes
Does 12-month edoxaban treatment reduce symptomatic recurrent VTE or VTE-related death in patients with cancer with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis compared to 3-month treatment?
Odds Ratio: 0.13 (95% CI 0.03–0.44)
Absolute Event Rate: 1% vs 7.2%
In cancer patients with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis, extending edoxaban treatment to 12 months significantly reduces the risk of recurrent VTE or VTE-related death compared to 3 months of treatment.
Supports 12-month edoxaban over 3 months in cancer-associated isolated distal DVT; extends duration evidence to this subgroup.
BACKGROUND: The optimal duration of anticoagulation therapy for isolated distal deep vein thrombosis in patients with cancer is clinically relevant, but the evidence is lacking. The prolonged anticoagulation therapy could have a potential benefit for prevention of thrombotic events; however, it could also increase the risk of bleeding. METHODS: In a multicenter, open-label, adjudicator-blinded, randomized clinical trial at 60 institutions in Japan, we randomly assigned patients with cancer with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis, in a 1-to-1 ratio, to receive either a 12-month or 3-month edoxaban treatment. The primary end point was a composite of a symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) or VTE-related death at 12 months. The major secondary end point was major bleeding at 12 months, according to the criteria of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. The primary hypothesis was that a 12-month edoxaban treatment was superior to a 3-month edoxaban treatment with respect to the primary end point. RESULTS: From April 2019 through June 2022, 604 patients were randomized, and after excluding 3 patients who withdrew consent, 601 patients were included in the intention-to-treat population: 296 patients in the 12-month edoxaban group and 305 patients in the 3-month edoxaban group. The mean age was 70.8 years, 28% of the patients were men, and 20% of the patients had symptoms of deep vein thrombosis at baseline. The primary end point of a symptomatic recurrent VTE event or VTE-related death occurred in 3 of the 296 patients (1.0%) in the 12-month edoxaban group and in 22 of the 305 patients (7.2%) in the 3-month edoxaban group (odds ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03-0.44). The major secondary end point of major bleeding occurred in 28 of the 296 patients (9.5%) in the 12-month edoxaban group and in 22 of the 305 patients (7.2%) in the 3-month edoxaban group (odds ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.75-2.41). The prespecified subgroups did not affect the estimates on the primary end point. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cancer with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis, 12 months was superior to 3 months for an edoxaban treatment with respect to the composite outcome of a symptomatic recurrent VTE or VTE-related death. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03895502.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamashita et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Cancer with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (n=601). Edoxaban vs. 3-month edoxaban treatment was evaluated on Composite of a symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) or VTE-related death at 12 months (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03-0.44). 12 months of edoxaban was superior to 3 months for reducing symptomatic recurrent VTE or VTE-related death in patients with cancer and isolated distal DVT (1.0% vs 7.2%; OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03-0.44).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: