Key result
The pathogenesis of venous thromboembolism can be explained as a combined micro-macrothrombosis via a unifying mechanism based on the two-path unifying theory of hemostasis.
Why the study?
The pathogenesis of each form of venous thrombosis is not clearly established, and isolated distal DVT and multiple proximal or central DVT are currently considered the same macrothrombotic disease.
This theoretical framework differentiates the pathogenesis of distal DVT from proximal/central DVT, suggesting that VTE in septic patients may represent a combined micro-macrothrombosis requiring reassessment of current therapeutic approaches.
Offers unifying VTE framework as micro-macrothrombosis; hypothesis-generating and requires validation before clinical consideration.
Venous thrombosis includes deep venous thrombosis (DVT), venous thromboembolism (VTE), venous microthrombosis and others. Still, the pathogenesis of each venous thrombosis is not clearly established. Currently, isolated distal DVT and multiple proximal/central DVT are considered to be the same macrothrombotic disease affecting the venous system but with varying degree of clinical expression related to its localization and severity. The genesis of two phenotypes of DVT differing in clinical features and prognostic outcome can be identified by their unique hemostatic mechanisms. Two recently proposed hemostatic theories in vivo have clearly defined the character between "microthrombi" and "macrothrombus" in the vascular system. Phenotypic expression of thrombosis depends upon two major variables: (1) depth of vascular wall damage and (2) extent of the injury affecting the vascular tree system. Vascular wall injury limited to endothelial cells (ECs) in sepsis produces "disseminated" microthrombi, but intravascular injury due to trauma extending from ECs to subendothelial tissue (SET) produces "local" macrothrombus. Pathogen-induced sepsis activates the complement system leading to generalized endotheliopathy, which releases ultra large von Willebrand factor (ULVWF) multimers from ECs and promotes ULVWF path of hemostasis. In the venous system, the activated ULVWF path initiates microthrombogenesis to form platelet-ULVWF complexes, which become "microthrombi strings" that produce venous endotheliopathy-associated vascular microthrombotic disease (vEA-VMTD) and immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP)-like syndrome. In the arterial system, endotheliopathy produces arterial EA-VMTD (aEA-VMTD) with "life-threatening" thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP)-like syndrome. Typically, vEA-VMTD is "silent" unless complicated by additional local venous vascular injury. A local venous vessel trauma without sepsis produces localized macrothrombosis due to activated ULVWF and tissue factor (TF) paths from damaged ECs and SET, which causes distal DVT with good prognosis. However, if a septic patient with "silent" vEA-VMTD is complicated by additional vascular injury from in-hospital vascular accesses, "venous combined micro-macrothrombosis" may develop as VTE via the unifying mechanism of the "two-path unifying theory" of hemostasis. This paradigm shifting pathogenetic difference between distal DVT and proximal/central DVT calls for a reassessment of current therapeutic approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jae C. Chang (2022) conducted a review in Venous thromboembolism. The pathogenesis of venous thromboembolism can be explained as a combined micro-macrothrombosis via a unifying mechanism based on the two-path unifying theory of hemostasis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: