Key result
Community-based focus groups of older adults revealed themes of fearing debilitating stroke, uncertainty in weighing new treatment risks, and the need for mutual respect with clinicians.
Why the study?
What are the beliefs and values of older adults regarding options for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation?
What are the beliefs and values of older adults regarding options for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation?
Older adults emphasize the fear of stroke, uncertainty about new treatments, and the importance of mutual respect in shared decision-making for stroke prevention.
Highlights stroke fears and mutual respect needs in older adults' AF decisions; leaves open integration into decision tools.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia that increases patients' risk of stroke, and determining an optimal prevention therapy is a preference-sensitive decision appropriate for shared decision making (SDM). Utilizing community-based focus groups, we explored beliefs and values around options for stroke prevention. Interview transcripts from five independent focus groups were qualitatively assessed and organized into themes. Most participants were taking a blood thinner (93%) and more than half of participants (64%) reported having AF. Few participants were familiar with newer therapies. Qualitative analysis revealed three themes: (a) fearing loss of self-control through debilitating stroke, (b) recognizing uncertainty in how to weigh risks and benefits of new treatments, and (c) needing mutual respect between clinicians and patients to consider new/alternative treatment regimens. These findings help direct future research efforts examining optimal timing for SDM and decision aids to promote mutual respect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grande et al. (2017) studied Atrial fibrillation and stroke risk. Beliefs and values around stroke prevention options was evaluated on Qualitative themes regarding stroke prevention. Community-based focus groups of older adults revealed themes of fearing debilitating stroke, uncertainty in weighing new treatment risks, and the need for mutual respect with clinicians.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: